America’s Frontline Doctors Sue Fauci, CDC, FDA And More!
Lawyer to be Guest on Dr. Rima Truth Reports
http://www.opensourcetruth.com/frontline-doctors-sue-fauci/
Lowell H. Becraft JD, the Dean of the Patriot Lawyers, has just filed a major lawsuit challenging the legality of the FDA’s “Emergency Use Authorizations” (EUA) for the COVID “vaccine” injections in the US District Court of his home state of Alabama.
Counsel Becraft will be Dr. Rima’s guest on her Unmasked Crusaders podcase at 6 PM EDT on June 15, 2021 — click HERE to learn how to listen live, or HERE for the archive.
The Complaint details the allegations over 113 pages, but here is the heart of it: there can be no Informed Consent where the Government lies to the People.
Here is how the Complaint (which you can read HERE) describes the case:
Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 10 Filed 06/10/21 – Page 1 of 113
1. On February 4, 2020, Alex M. Azar, II, the then serving Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), exercising his authority under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, declared that the SARS-Cov-2 virus created a “public health emergency” that had a “significant potential to affect national security” (the “Emergency Declaration”).
2. Based on the Declaration, the DHHS Secretary’s designee, the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), issued a series of Emergency Use Authorizations (“EUA”) under §360bbb-3. EUAs allow medical products that have not been fully tested and approved by the FDA to be sold to American consumers, in order to meet the exigencies of an emergency. Initially, the EUA medical products included various polymerase chain reaction (“PCR”) tests marketed as COVID19 diagnostic tools. Later, EUAs (collectively, the “Vaccine EUAs”) were issued for the so-called “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,”2 “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine”3 and the “Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine”4 (collectively, the “Vaccines”).5
3. The Emergency Declaration and the Vaccine EUAs were the keys that unlocked the profit potential of the COVID-19 crisis. They enabled the Vaccine manufacturers to open the door to the vast American market, enter and reap billions of dollars in profit by exploiting the fears of the American people. In the first quarter of 2021 alone, Pfizer has earned $3.5 billion, and Moderna has earned $1.7 billion, in revenues generated from the sale of their respective EUA Vaccines. Plaintiffs’ investigation has revealed that the Defendants appear to have numerous disclosed and undisclosed conflicts-of-interest that should deeply trouble any reasonable observer concerned about the integrity of the EUA process. For instance, Defendant the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) appears to be a co-creator and co-owner of the intellectual property in the “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.”
4. The Vaccines are unapproved, inadequately tested, experimental and dangerous biological agents that have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 disease itself. According to data extracted from the Defendants’ Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (“VAERS”), 99% of all deaths attributed to vaccines in the first quarter of 2021 are attributed to the COVID-19 Vaccines, and only 1% are attributed to all other vaccines. The number of vaccine deaths reported in the same period constitutes a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year. The Vaccines appear to be linked to a range of profoundly Issued December 18, 2020. See https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus
Serious medical complications, among them myocarditis, miscarriage, irregular vaginal bleeding, clotting disorders, strokes, vascular damage and autoimmune disease.
Meanwhile, Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen enjoy statutorily conferred immunity from liability for any harm caused by their experimental products.
5. The Vaccine EUAs are unlawful on multiple different grounds and must be terminated immediately. First, the Emergency Declaration upon which they are all based was unjustified. As Plaintiffs allege in detail and will show at trial with expert medical and scientific evidence, including the Defendants’ own data and studies, there is not now, and there never has been, a bona fide “public health emergency” due to the SARS-Cov-2 virus or the disease COVID-19. Virtually all of the PCR tests were calibrated to produce false positive results, which has enabled the Defendants and their counterparts in state governments to publish daily reports containing seriously inflated COVID-19 “case” and “death” counts that grossly exaggerate the public health threat.
Even assuming the accuracy of these counts, we now know that COVID-19 has a fatality rate far below that originally anticipated – 0.2% globally, and 0.03% for persons under the age of 70. According to the CDC, 95% of “COVID-19” deaths involve at least four additional co-morbidities. [Emphasis added.]
Read the full Complaint here: http://www.opensourcetruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Doc-10-Original-AFLDs-Complaint.pdf
Holly Clark Health Insurance 